IRTR vs. AACTX
IRTR (Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF) and AACTX (American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, IRTR returned 13.84% vs 12.83% for AACTX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IRTR charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AACTX.
Performance
IRTR vs. AACTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRTR achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than AACTX's 4.52% return.
IRTR
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AACTX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
IRTR vs. AACTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF | 5.36% | 12.70% | 7.59% | 10.63% |
AACTX American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund | 4.52% | 13.91% | 8.63% | 9.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRTR and AACTX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IRTR and AACTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRTR vs. AACTX — Risk / Return Rank
IRTR
AACTX
IRTR vs. AACTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund (AACTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRTR | AACTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.60 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 11.49 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRTR | AACTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.34 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 0.52 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
IRTR vs. AACTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRTR drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum AACTX drawdown of -46.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRTR and AACTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRTR | AACTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -46.28% | +39.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.82% | -5.12% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.34% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -5.53% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.15% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IRTR vs. AACTX - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund (AACTX) at 1.87%. This indicates that IRTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AACTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRTR | AACTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 1.87% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.85% | 4.52% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 5.69% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 7.47% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 7.76% | -0.73% |
IRTR vs. AACTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRTR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AACTX's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRTR vs. AACTX - Dividend Comparison
IRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than AACTX's 7.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AACTX American Funds 2020 Target Date Retirement Fund | 7.47% | 7.80% | 5.18% | 3.25% | 3.95% | 6.30% | 4.22% | 3.96% | 4.16% | 2.52% | 2.99% | 4.12% |
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF | 2.99% | 3.03% | 3.03% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IRTR and AACTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IRTR has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to AACTX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRTR dropped -6.29% vs AACTX's -46.28%.
AACTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRTR and AACTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer