PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRSQX vs. JLKYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IRSQX having a 10.20% return and JLKYX slightly higher at 10.39%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IRSQX having a 12.09% annualized return and JLKYX not far behind at 11.70%.


IRSQX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
10.20%
6M
9.28%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
12.09%

JLKYX

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
10.39%
6M
9.40%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRSQX
Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund
10.20%20.71%15.32%20.47%-18.75%18.82%17.28%25.25%-9.37%20.99%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
10.39%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IRSQX and JLKYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.97

The correlation between IRSQX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRSQX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRSQX
IRSQX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IRSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IRSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRSQXJLKYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.60

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

11.19

+1.71

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRSQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRSQX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRSQX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, roughly equal to the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRSQX and JLKYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRSQXJLKYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-32.55%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-9.16%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-16.11%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-25.75%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-32.55%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-2.26%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-4.64%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.12%

-0.17%

Volatility

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRSQXJLKYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

5.36%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

10.68%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.04%

12.90%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

15.36%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

16.20%

-0.06%

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRSQX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IRSQX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

IRSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.46%, more than JLKYX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRSQX
Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund
14.46%15.94%1.93%1.89%6.50%20.41%2.18%4.80%7.33%6.29%1.94%0.44%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.27%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IRSQX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLKYX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to IRSQX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRSQX dropped -33.06% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

IRSQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRSQX and JLKYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer