PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IROB.DE achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IROB.DE has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 11.79%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.68% annualized return.


IROB.DE

1D
-2.80%
1M
-9.10%
6M
5.82%
YTD
14.36%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
11.79%

CSH.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
6M
1.04%
YTD
1.05%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
0.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IROB.DE
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
14.36%10.23%4.16%20.99%-30.11%26.22%31.63%33.78%-17.80%28.83%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
1.05%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.11%-0.70%-0.69%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IROB.DE and CSH.PA is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2015

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IROB.DE
IROB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IROB.DECSH.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.86

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

5.77

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

34.47

-27.86

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IROB.DE and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IROB.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IROB.DE and CSH.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IROB.DECSH.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.51%

-5.07%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-0.35%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.95%

-0.35%

-31.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-0.75%

-35.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.51%

-3.57%

-32.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.43%

-0.32%

-12.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-1.51%

-9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

0.06%

+4.24%

Volatility

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 0.53%. This indicates that IROB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IROB.DECSH.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

0.53%

+9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.55%

0.65%

+18.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.11%

0.71%

+23.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.69%

0.42%

+21.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

0.32%

+20.89%

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IROB.DE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IROB.DE vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither IROB.DE nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IROB.DE and CSH.PA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IROB.DE.

IROB.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSH.PA is Money Market. IROB.DE tracks ROBO-STOX® Global Robotics and Automation, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IROB.DE and 0.10% for CSH.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IROB.DE and CSH.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer