IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE).

IROB.DE and QUTM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IROB.DE is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the ROBO-STOX® Global Robotics and Automation. It was launched on Oct 23, 2014. QUTM.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). It was launched on May 21, 2025. Both IROB.DE and QUTM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IROB.DE L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF	1.10%	20.04%
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc	-7.55%	14.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IROB.DE achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than QUTM.DE's -7.55% return.

IROB.DE

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 25.97%
• 3Y*: 6.89%
• 5Y*: 2.11%
• 10Y*: 11.31%

QUTM.DE

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: -7.55%
• 6M: -10.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IROB.DE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.

IROB.DE

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF

QUTM.DE

VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc

Return for Risk

IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IROB.DE

IROB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
IROB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IROB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
IROB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IROB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IROB.DE	QUTM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.46	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IROB.DE	QUTM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.24	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between IROB.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IROB.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IROB.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IROB.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IROB.DE and QUTM.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IROB.DE	QUTM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-23.74%	-12.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.77%	-19.97%	+9.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-8.11%	-3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IROB.DE	QUTM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.02%	28.62%	-3.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.82%	28.62%	-7.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.82%	28.62%	-7.80%