PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IROB.DE vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IROB.DE is traded in EUR, while BOTZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOTZ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IROB.DE achieves a 28.27% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.89% return.


IROB.DE

1D
-1.49%
1M
8.26%
YTD
28.27%
6M
26.53%
1Y
54.17%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
13.49%

BOTZ

1D
-0.61%
1M
4.12%
YTD
11.89%
6M
9.44%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
9.51%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IROB.DE
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
28.27%10.23%4.18%20.94%-30.08%26.20%31.63%33.76%-17.78%28.83%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
11.89%0.62%19.67%34.80%-39.14%16.77%39.40%34.78%-24.98%38.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IROB.DE and BOTZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.68

The correlation between IROB.DE and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IROB.DE
IROB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IROB.DEBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.20

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

1.57

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

4.87

+10.14

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IROB.DE and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IROB.DEBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.15

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.16

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.43

+0.14

Drawdowns

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IROB.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -47.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IROB.DE and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IROB.DEBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-47.08%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-16.89%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.95%

-32.72%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.52%

-47.08%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-2.89%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-14.88%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

5.42%

-1.82%

Volatility

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.01%. This indicates that IROB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IROB.DEBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

7.01%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.66%

17.07%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

23.00%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

25.27%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

25.23%

-4.22%

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IROB.DE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IROB.DE vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

IROB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
IROB.DE
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IROB.DE and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IROB.DE.

IROB.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. IROB.DE tracks ROBO-STOX® Global Robotics and Automation, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IROB.DE and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IROB.DE and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer