CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE).

CSH.PA and XEON.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSH.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2007. XEON.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. It was launched on May 27, 2007. Both CSH.PA and XEON.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.45%	2.25%	3.69%	3.22%	-0.06%	-0.65%	1.93%	-0.61%	-0.55%	-0.45%
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.47%	2.25%	3.78%	3.30%	-0.04%	-0.58%	-0.57%	-0.49%	-0.47%	-0.52%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSH.PA having a 0.45% return and XEON.DE slightly higher at 0.47%. Over the past 10 years, CSH.PA has outperformed XEON.DE with an annualized return of 0.88%, while XEON.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.66% annualized return.

CSH.PA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 2.02%
• 3Y*: 3.02%
• 5Y*: 1.80%
• 10Y*: 0.88%

XEON.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 2.05%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 0.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CSH.PA and XEON.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CSH.PA

Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc

XEON.DE

Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C

Return for Risk

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSH.PA

CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

XEON.DE

XEON.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
XEON.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
XEON.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
XEON.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
XEON.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSH.PA	XEON.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.80	7.17	-3.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.25	14.48	-8.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.89	3.44	-1.56
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.82	23.90	-12.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	64.78	217.70	-152.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is lower than the XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio of 7.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSH.PA and XEON.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSH.PA	XEON.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80	7.17	-3.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	5.13	7.19	-2.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.35	1.68	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.72	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CSH.PA and XEON.DE is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSH.PA nor XEON.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.05%	2.60%
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSH.PA drawdown since its inception was -3.73%, roughly equal to the maximum XEON.DE drawdown of -3.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSH.PA and XEON.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSH.PA	XEON.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-3.71%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	-0.08%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.87%	-0.82%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-2.34%	-3.33%	+0.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.05%	-0.93%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.01%	+0.02%

Volatility

CSH.PA vs. XEON.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) has a higher volatility of 0.29% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) at 0.06%. This indicates that CSH.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEON.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSH.PA	XEON.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.29%	0.06%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.41%	0.16%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53%	0.28%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.35%	0.26%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.64%	0.39%	+0.25%