PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRLNX vs. IGBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Global Bond Fund (IGBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRLNX achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than IGBIX's -1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IRLNX has outperformed IGBIX with an annualized return of 19.18%, while IGBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.


IRLNX

1D
-1.41%
1M
5.99%
YTD
7.75%
6M
6.99%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*
19.18%

IGBIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
-0.61%
1Y
0.62%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
-2.46%
10Y*
0.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
7.75%18.20%34.60%46.01%-30.06%30.63%38.32%35.61%-2.02%31.27%
IGBIX
Voya Global Bond Fund
-1.00%7.51%-1.07%6.05%-18.48%-5.58%10.12%7.59%-1.89%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IRLNX and IGBIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009

0.13

The correlation between IRLNX and IGBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRLNX vs. IGBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRLNX
IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IGBIX
IGBIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IGBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IGBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Global Bond Fund (IGBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRLNXIGBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.04

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

0.22

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

0.59

+5.20

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRLNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the IGBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRLNX and IGBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRLNXIGBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

0.20

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

-0.38

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.11

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.52

+0.41

Drawdowns

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRLNX drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, which is greater than IGBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRLNX and IGBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRLNXIGBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.90%

-28.58%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.64%

-5.27%

-11.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-7.74%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.90%

-26.58%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.90%

-28.58%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-14.30%

+12.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-6.00%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

1.86%

+3.16%

Volatility

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Voya Global Bond Fund (IGBIX) at 2.27%. This indicates that IRLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRLNXIGBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

2.27%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

4.46%

+7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

5.86%

+10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

6.69%

+15.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

5.96%

+15.49%

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than IGBIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Dividend Comparison

IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.16%, more than IGBIX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGBIX
Voya Global Bond Fund
3.89%3.44%4.58%3.35%3.31%4.04%4.43%4.66%4.75%4.84%4.69%4.72%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
19.16%9.54%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%3.70%0.99%1.23%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRLNX and IGBIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRLNX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to IGBIX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRLNX dropped -32.90% vs IGBIX's -28.58%.

IRLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRLNX and IGBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer