IRLNX vs. IGBIX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

IRLNX (Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio) and IGBIX (Voya Global Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - IRLNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Voya, while IGBIX is a Global Bonds fund managed by Voya. Over the past 10 years, IRLNX returned 18.08%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for IGBIX. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IRLNX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IGBIX.

Performance

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Global Bond Fund (IGBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRLNX achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than IGBIX's -1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IRLNX has outperformed IGBIX with an annualized return of 18.08%, while IGBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.44% annualized return.

IRLNX

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: -0.51%
• 6M: 5.90%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 1Y: 11.37%
• 3Y*: 21.65%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 18.08%
• ALL TIME*: 17.09%

IGBIX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.85%
• 6M: -2.13%
• YTD: -1.89%
• 1Y: -1.69%
• 3Y*: 2.73%
• 5Y*: -2.63%
• 10Y*: 0.44%
• ALL TIME*: 2.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IGBIX Voya Global Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	2.58%	18.20%	34.60%	46.01%	-30.06%	30.63%	38.32%	35.61%	-2.02%	31.27%
IGBIX Voya Global Bond Fund	-1.89%	7.51%	-1.07%	6.05%	-18.48%	-5.58%	10.12%	7.59%	-1.89%	9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IRLNX and IGBIX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009	0.14

Over the past year, IRLNX and IGBIX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

IRLNX vs. IGBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IRLNX

IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 15
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

IGBIX

IGBIX Risk / Return Rank: 3
IGBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
IGBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IGBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IGBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IGBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Global Bond Fund (IGBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IRLNX	IGBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	-0.06	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	-0.05	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.99	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	-0.07	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	-0.15	+2.24

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRLNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the IGBIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRLNX and IGBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRLNX drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, which is greater than IGBIX's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRLNX and IGBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRLNX	IGBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.90%	-28.58%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.64%	-5.27%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.31%	-7.21%	-16.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.90%	-26.29%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.90%	-28.58%	-4.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.57%	-15.06%	+8.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-6.07%	+1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.66%	2.36%	+3.30%

Volatility

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Voya Global Bond Fund (IGBIX) at 1.51%. This indicates that IRLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRLNX	IGBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	1.51%	+5.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.93%	4.74%	+10.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.58%	5.86%	+12.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.36%	6.75%	+15.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.62%	5.98%	+15.64%

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than IGBIX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRLNX vs. IGBIX - Dividend Comparison

IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.13%, more than IGBIX's 3.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGBIX Voya Global Bond Fund	3.55%	3.44%	4.58%	3.35%	3.31%	4.04%	4.43%	4.66%	4.75%	4.84%	4.69%	4.72%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	20.13%	9.54%	3.55%	4.60%	11.22%	0.83%	4.18%	4.95%	3.70%	0.99%	1.23%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRLNX and IGBIX in my portfolio?

IRLNX and IGBIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRLNX or IGBIX?

IRLNX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to IGBIX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRLNX dropped -32.90% vs IGBIX's -28.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.