PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRNX vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRNX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 10.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRNX has underperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 3.96%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.31% annualized return.


FSRNX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
8.92%
6M
9.19%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
3.96%

VNQ

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
10.32%
6M
10.63%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
8.92%3.03%4.99%11.93%-26.14%40.66%-11.31%23.78%-4.91%3.15%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
10.32%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRNX and VNQ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.99

The correlation between FSRNX and VNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRNX vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRNX
FSRNX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FSRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRNXVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

4.45

-0.59

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRNX and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRNX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRNX and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRNXVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.26%

-73.07%

+28.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-8.34%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-17.46%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.27%

-34.48%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.26%

-42.40%

-1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-1.95%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-13.60%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.66%

+0.03%

Volatility

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) have volatilities of 5.05% and 5.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRNXVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

5.03%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

10.15%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

13.81%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

18.85%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

20.75%

+0.68%

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRNX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSRNX vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

FSRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than VNQ's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRNX
Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund
2.72%2.77%2.86%2.84%2.66%1.25%3.33%4.52%3.62%2.27%3.40%2.57%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.61%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FSRNX and VNQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSRNX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to VNQ (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRNX dropped -44.26% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

VNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRNX and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer