IREG vs. XDSQ
IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IREG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
IREG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IREG achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 3.05% return.
IREG
- 1D
- -7.71%
- 1M
- -15.58%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- -7.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IREG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 15.19% | 16.86% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 3.05% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IREG and XDSQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IREG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
IREG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDSQ
IREG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IREG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IREG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IREG drawdown since its inception was -80.08%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IREG and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IREG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.08% | -26.06% | -54.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.09% | -0.03% | -54.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.16% | -4.91% | -39.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
IREG vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IREG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.96% | 10.50% | +197.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.96% | 15.28% | +192.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.96% | 15.02% | +192.94% |
IREG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IREG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
IREG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither IREG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IREG and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.
IREG and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IREG and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for IREG and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer