PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRCPX vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRCPX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IRCPX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 4.51%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


IRCPX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.84%
YTD
3.61%
6M
3.75%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
4.51%

TIBIX

1D
0.65%
1M
3.13%
YTD
17.96%
6M
21.37%
1Y
39.83%
3Y*
26.83%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRCPX
Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio
3.61%9.54%5.85%9.09%-13.69%4.87%10.77%13.81%-4.66%7.82%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.96%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IRCPX and TIBIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2009

0.66

The correlation between IRCPX and TIBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRCPX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRCPX
IRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRCPXTIBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.96

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

7.48

-4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.74

29.20

-14.46

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRCPX and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRCPXTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

4.77

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.48

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.95

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.77

+0.15

Drawdowns

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRCPX drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRCPX and TIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRCPXTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-48.88%

+31.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.54%

-5.39%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.29%

-9.23%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

-20.79%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.75%

-34.85%

+17.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-5.96%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.38%

-0.61%

Volatility

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) is 1.70%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that IRCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRCPXTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

3.12%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

6.99%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

8.46%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

11.16%

-5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.82%

13.50%

-7.68%

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRCPX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRCPX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

IRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.57%, more than TIBIX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRCPX
Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio
16.57%17.17%4.99%4.01%13.97%4.50%4.29%4.59%2.93%3.78%3.95%5.67%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.03%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRCPX and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIBIX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to IRCPX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRCPX dropped -17.75% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRCPX and TIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer