IRBO vs. IAK
IRBO (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRBO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IRBO returned 10.52%/yr vs 15.99%/yr for IAK. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAK.
Performance
IRBO vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 43.11% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 10.11% return.
IRBO
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- 6M
- 32.62%
- YTD
- 43.11%
- 1Y
- 63.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.10%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.27M | $20.59M | $12.29M | |
| $35.64M | $36.90M | $59.33M |
IRBO vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 43.11% | 29.97% | 8.02% | 36.37% | -37.89% | 6.32% | 48.85% | 34.47% | -13.76% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 10.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRBO and IAK is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between IRBO and IAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IRBO vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IRBO
IAK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
IRBO
IAK
-
Communication Services
IRBO
IAK
-
Industrials
IRBO
IAK
-
Utilities
IRBO
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IRBO
IAK
-
Real Estate
IRBO
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
IRBO
IAK
-
Healthcare
IRBO
IAK
Basic Materials
IRBO
-
IAK
-
Energy
IRBO
-
IAK
-
Financial Services
IRBO
-
IAK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRBO vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
IRBO
IAK
IRBO vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRBO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.59 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 6.29 | +2.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRBO vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRBO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.50% | -77.38% | +22.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.00% | -7.62% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | -11.58% | -20.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.53% | -14.76% | -35.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.61% | -3.20% | -11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.68% | -16.01% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.46% | 3.13% | +4.33% |
Volatility
IRBO vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 6.56%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRBO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.41% | 6.56% | +7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.09% | 12.42% | +20.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.42% | 15.99% | +21.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.34% | 18.13% | +12.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.65% | 20.92% | +7.73% |
IRBO vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRBO vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than IAK's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.42% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRBO and IAK have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRBO has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to IAK (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBO dropped -54.50% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 5-year performance, IAK leads with 15.99% vs 10.52% for IRBO. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IAK has performed better with a 15.99% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IRBO.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.06% for IRBO.
IRBO is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while IAK is Financials Equities. IRBO tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.38% for IAK.
IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRBO and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer