IRBO vs. GPTY
IRBO (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and GPTY (YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. IRBO is passively managed, while GPTY is actively managed. Over the past year, IRBO returned 63.16% vs 34.14% for GPTY. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GPTY.
Performance
IRBO vs. GPTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 43.11% return, which is significantly higher than GPTY's 22.74% return.
IRBO
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- 6M
- 32.62%
- YTD
- 43.11%
- 1Y
- 63.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.10%
GPTY
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 23.79%
- YTD
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 34.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.87M | $1.87M | $2.59M | |
| $35.64M | $36.90M | $59.33M |
IRBO vs. GPTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 43.11% | 18.99% |
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 22.74% | 17.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRBO and GPTY is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IRBO and GPTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IRBO vs. GPTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IRBO
GPTY
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
IRBO
GPTY
Communication Services
IRBO
GPTY
Industrials
IRBO
GPTY
Utilities
IRBO
GPTY
-
Consumer Cyclical
IRBO
GPTY
Real Estate
IRBO
GPTY
-
Consumer Defensive
IRBO
GPTY
-
Healthcare
IRBO
GPTY
-
Basic Materials
IRBO
-
GPTY
-
Energy
IRBO
-
GPTY
-
Financial Services
IRBO
-
GPTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRBO vs. GPTY — Risk / Return Rank
IRBO
GPTY
IRBO vs. GPTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRBO | GPTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 1.78 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 4.09 | +4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRBO vs. GPTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than GPTY's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and GPTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRBO | GPTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.50% | -26.62% | -27.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.00% | -19.32% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.61% | -11.26% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.68% | -6.86% | -12.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.46% | 8.37% | -0.91% |
Volatility
IRBO vs. GPTY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) at 10.04%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRBO | GPTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.41% | 10.04% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.09% | 22.71% | +10.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.42% | 27.45% | +9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.34% | 29.93% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.65% | 29.93% | -1.28% |
IRBO vs. GPTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GPTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRBO vs. GPTY - Dividend Comparison
IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than GPTY's 37.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 37.82% | 34.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRBO and GPTY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRBO has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to GPTY (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBO dropped -54.50% vs GPTY's -26.62%.
On 1-year performance, IRBO leads with 63.16% vs 34.14% for GPTY. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, GPTY has been the lower-risk option at 10.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 63.16% return vs 34.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GPTY.
GPTY has the higher dividend yield at 37.82%, compared with 0.06% for IRBO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.99% for GPTY.
IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRBO and GPTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer