IQSZ vs. KLMN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IQSZ (Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF) and KLMN (Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSZ is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while KLMN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index. IQSZ is actively managed, while KLMN is passively managed. Over the past year, IQSZ returned 28.75% vs 21.30% for KLMN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for KLMN.

Performance

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSZ achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than KLMN's 10.46% return.

IQSZ

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 10.99%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 1Y: 28.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLMN

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 9.10%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 1Y: 21.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF	13.58%	13.36%
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	10.46%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSZ and KLMN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.91

The correlation between IQSZ and KLMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IQSZ vs. KLMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSZ

IQSZ Risk / Return Rank: 79
IQSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
IQSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
IQSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IQSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IQSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

KLMN

KLMN Risk / Return Rank: 64
KLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
KLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
KLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
KLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
KLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IQSZ	KLMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.69	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.35	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	2.39	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.42	10.23	+3.19

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the KLMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSZ and KLMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSZ drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum KLMN drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSZ and KLMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSZ	KLMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.12%	-19.16%	+10.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.12%	-8.96%	-0.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-1.05%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-2.48%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	2.09%	+0.06%

Volatility

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) at 3.02%. This indicates that IQSZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQSZ	KLMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	3.02%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	9.95%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	12.68%	+1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.07%	17.33%	-3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.07%	17.33%	-3.26%

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMN's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IQSZ vs. KLMN - Dividend Comparison

IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than KLMN's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF	1.77%	1.03%
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	1.20%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQSZ and KLMN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IQSZ and KLMN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IQSZ or KLMN?

IQSZ has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to KLMN (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSZ dropped -9.12% vs KLMN's -19.16%.

Which ETF is better, IQSZ or KLMN?

On 1-year performance, IQSZ leads with 28.75% vs 21.30% for KLMN. On fees, KLMN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, KLMN has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQSZ or KLMN?

Over the 1-year period, IQSZ has performed better with a 28.75% return vs 21.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQSZ or KLMN?

KLMN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IQSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQSZ or KLMN?

IQSZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.20% for KLMN.

What is the main difference between IQSZ and KLMN?

IQSZ is categorized as ESG, while KLMN is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IQSZ and 0.09% for KLMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQSZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.