KLMN vs. MSDD
KLMN (Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF) and MSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KLMN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index, while MSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. KLMN is passively managed, while MSDD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. KLMN charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MSDD.
Performance
KLMN vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLMN achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -47.16% return.
KLMN
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSDD
- 1D
- 13.67%
- 1M
- 85.18%
- YTD
- -47.16%
- 6M
- -24.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLMN vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF | 10.80% | 13.93% |
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF | -47.16% | 271.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLMN and MSDD is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLMN vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank
KLMN
MSDD
KLMN vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KLMN | MSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KLMN | MSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.70 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
KLMN vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLMN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLMN and MSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLMN | MSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -84.91% | +65.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -67.67% | +66.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -29.42% | +26.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility
KLMN vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLMN | MSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 141.56% | -129.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 141.56% | -123.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 141.56% | -123.95% |
KLMN vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLMN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLMN vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison
KLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF | 1.28% | 1.25% |
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLMN and MSDD have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KLMN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KLMN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.
KLMN has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.
KLMN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KLMN and 1.50% for MSDD.
Find the right allocation for KLMN and MSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer