IQSZ vs. EFIV
IQSZ (Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF) and EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSZ is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while EFIV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. IQSZ is actively managed, while EFIV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EFIV.
Performance
IQSZ vs. EFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSZ achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than EFIV's 8.20% return.
IQSZ
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFIV
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSZ vs. EFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 11.32% | 13.36% |
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 8.20% | 12.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSZ and EFIV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSZ vs. EFIV — Risk / Return Rank
IQSZ
EFIV
IQSZ vs. EFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSZ | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.14 | 1.04 | +1.10 |
Drawdowns
IQSZ vs. EFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSZ drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum EFIV drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSZ and EFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSZ | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -24.52% | +15.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -2.61% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.22% | -4.80% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
IQSZ vs. EFIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSZ | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 12.13% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 16.96% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 16.86% | -2.84% |
IQSZ vs. EFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EFIV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IQSZ vs. EFIV - Dividend Comparison
IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than EFIV's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.95% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.19% | 0.65% |
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 1.32% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IQSZ and EFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EFIV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EFIV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IQSZ.
IQSZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.95% for EFIV.
IQSZ is categorized as ESG, while EFIV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IQSZ and 0.10% for EFIV.
Find the right allocation for IQSZ and EFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer