IQSU vs. FLJH
Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH).
IQSU and FLJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQSU is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2019. FLJH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both IQSU and FLJH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IQSU vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IQSU vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | -5.15% | 14.44% | 16.64% | 32.96% | -22.10% | 30.53% | 28.24% | 1.24% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 9.29% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | -2.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 9.29% return.
IQSU
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- -5.15%
- 6M
- -2.36%
- 1Y
- 15.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FLJH
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 40.53%
- 3Y*
- 28.77%
- 5Y*
- 18.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQSU vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IQSU and FLJH have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IQSU vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank
IQSU
FLJH
IQSU vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQSU | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.77 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.43 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.36 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 3.32 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 12.34 | -7.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSU | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.77 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 1.00 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSU and FLJH is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IQSU vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison
IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than FLJH's 3.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.15% | 1.47% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 3.57% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
IQSU vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and FLJH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSU | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -31.51% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -11.83% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.76% | -20.39% | -6.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.74% | -5.01% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -5.39% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.19% | +0.03% |
Volatility
IQSU vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) is 5.39%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that IQSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IQSU | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 7.76% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 14.50% | -4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 23.00% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 18.50% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 19.90% | +0.92% |