IQSM vs. RUNN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IQSM (IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and RUNN (Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. IQSM is passively managed, while RUNN is actively managed. Over the past year, IQSM returned 22.78% vs -1.91% for RUNN. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RUNN.

Performance

IQSM vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSM achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's -3.00% return.

IQSM

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 12.17%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RUNN

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: -3.00%
• 6M: -3.15%
• 1Y: -1.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSM vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	11.77%	7.97%	9.15%	10.13%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-3.00%	2.30%	17.16%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSM and RUNN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023	0.86

The correlation between IQSM and RUNN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSM vs. RUNN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQSM	RUNN
Industrials	23.1%	39.4%
Technology	15.5%	17.8%
Healthcare	14.2%	13.3%
Financial Services	12.4%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	8.3%
Real Estate	10.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	-
Basic Materials	4.1%	2.0%
Energy	2.6%	-
Communication Services	2.6%	2.1%
Utilities	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

IQSM vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSM

IQSM Risk / Return Rank: 48
IQSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
IQSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IQSM Omega Ratio Rank: 42
IQSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IQSM Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 7
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSM vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	-0.15	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	-0.13	+2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.99	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	-0.19	+2.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	-0.44	+9.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQSM vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSM and RUNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	-0.15	+1.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.68	+0.06

Drawdowns

IQSM vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSM drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSM and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.66%	-16.83%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-10.34%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.89%	+7.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-3.54%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	4.34%	-1.92%

Volatility

IQSM vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) at 3.57%. This indicates that IQSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.57%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.98%	9.70%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	12.85%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.89%	13.81%	+4.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.89%	13.81%	+4.08%

IQSM vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQSM vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

IQSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than RUNN's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.06%	1.18%	1.22%	1.11%	0.32%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.57%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQSM and RUNN in my portfolio?

IQSM and RUNN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQSM or RUNN?

IQSM has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to RUNN (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSM dropped -23.66% vs RUNN's -16.83%.

Which ETF is better, IQSM or RUNN?

On 1-year performance, IQSM leads with 22.78% vs -1.91% for RUNN. On fees, IQSM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RUNN has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQSM or RUNN?

Over the 1-year period, IQSM has performed better with a 22.78% return vs -1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQSM or RUNN?

IQSM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RUNN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQSM or RUNN?

IQSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.57% for RUNN.

What is the main difference between IQSM and RUNN?

They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Running Oak Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSM and 0.58% for RUNN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.