IQSM vs. RUNN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN).

IQSM and RUNN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQSM is a passively managed fund by IndexIQ that tracks the performance of the IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Oct 24, 2022. RUNN is an actively managed fund by Running Oak Capital. It was launched on Jun 7, 2023.

Performance

IQSM vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IQSM vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.34%	7.97%	9.15%	10.13%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-2.84%	2.30%	17.16%	12.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSM achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's -2.84% return.

IQSM

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: 1.34%
• 6M: 3.59%
• 1Y: 15.47%
• 3Y*: 10.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RUNN

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -6.32%
• YTD: -2.84%
• 6M: -5.00%
• 1Y: 0.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSM vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

RUNN

Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF

IQSM

IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

Return for Risk

IQSM vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSM

IQSM Risk / Return Rank: 39
IQSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IQSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IQSM Omega Ratio Rank: 38
IQSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IQSM Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 12
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSM vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	0.02	+0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	0.15	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.02	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	0.04	+1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.83	0.11	+4.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQSM vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSM and RUNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	0.02	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.72	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between IQSM and RUNN is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IQSM vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

IQSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than RUNN's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.17%	1.18%	1.22%	1.11%	0.32%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.57%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IQSM vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSM drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSM and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.66%	-16.83%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.94%	-10.60%	-3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.47%	-7.74%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-3.36%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	3.82%	-0.52%

Volatility

IQSM vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) at 4.42%. This indicates that IQSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQSM	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	4.42%	+1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.35%	9.85%	+1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.51%	16.68%	+3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.05%	13.87%	+4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	13.87%	+4.18%