PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSI vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSI vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSI achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.


IQSI

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.63%
YTD
9.26%
6M
11.32%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
7.94%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSI vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
9.26%26.95%4.84%16.21%-14.76%12.70%10.36%0.27%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%7.21%-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSI and CIL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.76

The correlation between IQSI and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQSI vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSI
CIL

Financial Services

22.2%
24.8%

Industrials

16.8%
18.4%

Technology

15.9%
6.4%

Healthcare

13.2%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
8.8%

Basic Materials

5.6%
6.6%

Communication Services

4.1%
5.8%

Utilities

4.0%
6.6%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.2%

Energy

0.9%
4.6%

Financial Services

IQSI
22.2%
CIL
24.8%

Industrials

IQSI
16.8%
CIL
18.4%

Technology

IQSI
15.9%
CIL
6.4%

Healthcare

IQSI
13.2%
CIL
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSI
7.6%
CIL
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

IQSI
6.0%
CIL
8.8%

Basic Materials

IQSI
5.6%
CIL
6.6%

Communication Services

IQSI
4.1%
CIL
5.8%

Utilities

IQSI
4.0%
CIL
6.6%

Real Estate

IQSI
2.3%
CIL
2.2%

Energy

IQSI
0.9%
CIL
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSI vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSI
IQSI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IQSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSI vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSICILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.49

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.95

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

16.75

-10.81

IQSI vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSI and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSICILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.24

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.43

+0.07

Drawdowns

IQSI vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSI drawdown since its inception was -31.90%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSI and CIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSICILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.90%

-36.27%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-4.60%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-11.96%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.86%

-29.89%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.58%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-6.56%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

1.07%

+2.20%

Volatility

IQSI vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that IQSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSICILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

0.00%

+4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

4.23%

+8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

8.19%

+7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

16.49%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

17.17%

+1.83%

IQSI vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSI vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

IQSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.67%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
2.50%2.75%2.79%2.98%2.89%2.75%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSI and CIL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSI has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSI dropped -31.90% vs CIL's -36.27%.

On 5-year performance, IQSI leads with 7.66% vs 7.45% for CIL. On fees, IQSI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQSI has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

IQSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

IQSI tracks IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSI and 0.45% for CIL.

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSI and CIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer