IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQT.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 21.81%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
IS3N.DE
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.49 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 4.42 | +8.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 16.00 | +19.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 2.69 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.53 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.55 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.44 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -35.06% | -22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -10.52% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -19.17% | -12.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -22.01% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -32.51% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.49% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -9.30% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.91% | +0.23% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 7.16%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 7.16% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 14.69% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 17.32% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 16.19% | +5.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 18.04% | +2.76% |
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer