IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and ESGP.DE (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while ESGP.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQQT.DE returned 40.38%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for ESGP.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than ESGP.DE's 6.87% return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 10.78% |
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 6.87% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and ESGP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
ESGP.DE
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.18 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 1.83 | +10.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 5.36 | +30.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 1.02 | +3.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -20.50% | -37.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -6.31% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -20.50% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.57% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -5.31% | -7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.16% | +0.98% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 3.24% | +6.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 8.68% | +10.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 11.29% | +12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 14.54% | +7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 14.54% | +6.26% |
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ESGP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGP.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGP.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while ESGP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer