IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for CEBL.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CEBL.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than CEBL.DE's 31.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed CEBL.DE with an annualized return of 21.81%, while CEBL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and CEBL.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and CEBL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
CEBL.DE
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.50 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 4.83 | +7.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 17.67 | +17.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 2.81 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.48 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.58 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.43 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than CEBL.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and CEBL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -35.09% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.43% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -20.53% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -29.00% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -33.12% | +0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.85% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -11.09% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.13% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) at 8.24%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEBL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 8.24% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 16.36% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 19.68% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 18.48% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 18.94% | +1.86% |
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CEBL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and CEBL.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and CEBL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer