PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQQ vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQQ vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than QB's 10.47% return.


IQQQ

1D
-0.30%
1M
9.88%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.39%
1Y
38.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ and QB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.80

IQQQ vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQQQ
QB

Technology

53.8%
49.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
8.6%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.3%

Industrials

2.8%
3.7%

Utilities

1.4%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.3%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

IQQQ
53.8%
QB
49.9%

Communication Services

IQQQ
15.8%
QB
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IQQQ
12.3%
QB
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

IQQQ
7.7%
QB
8.6%

Healthcare

IQQQ
4.2%
QB
5.3%

Industrials

IQQQ
2.8%
QB
3.7%

Utilities

IQQQ
1.4%
QB
1.6%

Basic Materials

IQQQ
1.1%
QB
1.3%

Energy

IQQQ
0.6%
QB
0.6%

Financial Services

IQQQ
0.2%
QB
0.2%

Real Estate

IQQQ
0.1%
QB
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQQ vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

QB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQQQBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

IQQQ vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQQQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

3.17

-1.92

Drawdowns

IQQQ vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQQQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-1.83%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.30%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-0.34%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

Volatility

IQQQ vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQQQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

5.75%

+9.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

5.75%

+12.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

5.75%

+12.82%

IQQQ vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQQ vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
4.42%10.34%7.27%
QB
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
0.62%0.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQQ and QB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.62% for QB.

IQQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IQQQ and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQQ and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer