IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE
IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQH.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQH.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE has outperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 11.71%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 35.95%
- 1Y
- 78.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQH.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IQQH.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQH.DE
IS3N.DE
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQH.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.49 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 4.42 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.88 | 16.00 | +3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQH.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.69 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.53 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.44 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQH.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.09% | -35.06% | -51.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -10.52% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.43% | -19.17% | -25.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -22.01% | -35.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.78% | -32.51% | -31.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -2.49% | -21.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.78% | -9.30% | -50.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 2.91% | +0.99% |
Volatility
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 7.16%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQH.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 7.16% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 14.69% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 17.32% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 16.19% | +8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 18.04% | +7.04% |
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQH.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQH.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
IQQH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer