PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQQH.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 23.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.07%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.


IQQH.DE

1D
-2.25%
1M
-12.69%
YTD
23.10%
6M
23.40%
1Y
56.06%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
10.07%

SCHG

1D
0.57%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
4.12%
6M
2.85%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
18.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
23.10%29.63%-21.56%-22.41%0.55%-18.08%117.29%47.44%-4.63%5.73%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.12%3.56%43.86%45.60%-27.58%37.70%27.67%39.09%3.27%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQH.DE and SCHG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.40

The correlation between IQQH.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQH.DESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

1.12

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

3.18

+8.67

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQH.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -87.02%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQH.DESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.02%

-31.88%

-55.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-15.64%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.32%

-28.18%

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.98%

-30.34%

-27.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.20%

-31.88%

-32.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.76%

-4.82%

-37.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-5.23%

-58.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

5.49%

-0.77%

Volatility

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.20%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQH.DESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

5.20%

+4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.24%

11.66%

+8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.05%

16.26%

+9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.02%

22.04%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.15%

21.90%

+3.25%

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.91%1.33%1.24%0.80%0.53%0.73%0.49%1.56%2.87%2.88%2.81%2.60%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.40%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQH.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

IQQH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer