IQQH.DE vs. SCHG
IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQH.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQH.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IQQH.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.71%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 77.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 8.00% | 3.56% | 43.86% | 45.60% | -27.58% | 37.70% | 27.67% | 39.09% | 3.27% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQH.DE and SCHG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009 | 0.40 |
The correlation between IQQH.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
IQQH.DE
SCHG
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQH.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.25 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 1.42 | +4.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.88 | 4.12 | +15.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQH.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.41 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.76 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.85 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.91 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQH.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.09% | -31.88% | -54.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -15.64% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.74% | -28.18% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -30.34% | -27.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.78% | -31.88% | -31.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -1.46% | -22.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.78% | -5.23% | -54.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 5.40% | -1.50% |
Volatility
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.18%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQH.DE | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 3.18% | +6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 11.13% | +7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 15.84% | +8.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 21.97% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 21.86% | +3.22% |
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQH.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQH.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
IQQH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer