IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE
IQQG.DE (iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - IQQG.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® Total Market (TMI) Growth Large while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQG.DE returned 10.04%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQG.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQG.DE achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IQQG.DE having a 10.04% annualized return and AMED.DE not far behind at 9.75%.
IQQG.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQG.DE iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF | 11.22% | 11.02% | 9.86% | 21.00% | -17.49% | 26.92% | 5.51% | 37.01% | -12.14% | 12.69% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQG.DE and AMED.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IQQG.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQG.DE
AMED.DE
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IQQG.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.49 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 9.40 | -5.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.74 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.47 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQG.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQG.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -38.35% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.50% | -10.56% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.95% | -14.07% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.16% | -24.06% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.51% | -38.35% | +3.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -6.69% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 2.81% | +1.06% |
Volatility
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IQQG.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) at 5.61%. This indicates that IQQG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQG.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 5.61% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.75% | 12.64% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.75% | 15.19% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 15.87% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 17.00% | +1.71% |
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQG.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQG.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQG.DE iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF | 1.08% | 1.04% | 0.98% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.55% | 0.99% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.80% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IQQG.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQG.DE.
IQQG.DE tracks EURO STOXX® Total Market (TMI) Growth Large, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IQQG.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQG.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer