IQQG.DE vs. SXRV.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IQQG.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE).
IQQG.DE and SXRV.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX® Total Market (TMI) Growth Large. It was launched on Nov 4, 2005. SXRV.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both IQQG.DE and SXRV.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IQQG.DE or SXRV.DE.
Key characteristics
| IQQG.DE | SXRV.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.25% | 15.07% |
| 1Y Return | 15.58% | 23.50% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.71% | 10.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.47% | 19.80% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.01% | 19.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.15 | 1.65 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.40% | 16.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.23% | -31.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.57% | -7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQG.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IQQG.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IQQG.DE achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than SXRV.DE's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQG.DE has underperformed SXRV.DE with an annualized return of 8.01%, while SXRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 19.10% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQQG.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQG.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IQQG.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IQQG.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IQQG.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQQG.DE nor SXRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQG.DE iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.00% | 0.55% | 0.99% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.80% | 1.70% |
SXRV.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IQQG.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQG.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than SXRV.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQG.DE and SXRV.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IQQG.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Euro Total Market Growth Large UCITS ETF (IQQG.DE) is 4.62%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that IQQG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.