IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE
IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQC.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50, while XCMC.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQQC.DE returned 8.94%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for XCMC.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQC.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XCMC.DE.
Performance
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than XCMC.DE's 28.51% return.
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.13%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -6.44% |
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 11.92% | -9.34% | 24.84% | -11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQC.DE and XCMC.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQC.DE
XCMC.DE
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQC.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 3.72 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 8.44 | -8.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQC.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 1.66 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.44 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than XCMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and XCMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQC.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.50% | -22.91% | -44.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.24% | -7.80% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -14.82% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -3.42% | -20.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -12.68% | -15.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 3.45% | +3.71% |
Volatility
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) at 4.94%. This indicates that IQQC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQC.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 4.94% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 15.31% | -2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 17.48% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 17.33% | +10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 17.33% | +7.74% |
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XCMC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQC.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while XCMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQC.DE and XCMC.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
IQQC.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XCMC.DE is Commodities. IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQC.DE and 0.19% for XCMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQC.DE and XCMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer