IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE
IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and CNAA.DE (Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - IQQC.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while CNAA.DE tracks the MSCI China A. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQC.DE returned -2.24%/yr vs -0.21%/yr for CNAA.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQC.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAA.DE.
Performance
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than CNAA.DE's 9.91% return.
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
CNAA.DE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 11.42% |
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 9.91% | 10.09% | 19.81% | -17.19% | -20.96% | 13.50% | 28.18% | 12.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQC.DE and CNAA.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IQQC.DE and CNAA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQC.DE
CNAA.DE
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQC.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.37 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 5.08 | -5.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 13.52 | -13.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQC.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 2.04 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | -0.01 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.29 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than CNAA.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and CNAA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQC.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.50% | -43.90% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.24% | -6.65% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -27.84% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.35% | -41.85% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -11.33% | -12.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -19.23% | -8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 2.50% | +4.66% |
Volatility
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) at 6.13%. This indicates that IQQC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNAA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQC.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 6.13% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 11.38% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 16.52% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 21.44% | +6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 22.51% | +2.56% |
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CNAA.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQC.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while CNAA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQC.DE and CNAA.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNAA.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNAA.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while CNAA.DE tracks MSCI China A. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQC.DE and 0.35% for CNAA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQC.DE and CNAA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer