IQQB.DE vs. QDVO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).
IQQB.DE and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQB.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Brazil. It was launched on Nov 18, 2005. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.
Performance
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IQQB.DE iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 24.33% | 29.90% | -15.27% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | -2.93% | 5.90% | 20.00% |
Different Trading Currencies
IQQB.DE is traded in EUR, while QDVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QDVO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQB.DE achieves a 24.33% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -2.93% return.
IQQB.DE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 24.33%
- 6M
- 32.60%
- 1Y
- 43.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
QDVO
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -2.93%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- 1Y
- 13.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQB.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank
IQQB.DE
QDVO
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQB.DE | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 0.64 | +1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.03 | +1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 1.07 | +2.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 3.79 | +7.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQB.DE | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 0.64 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.71 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQB.DE and QDVO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison
IQQB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than QDVO's 11.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQB.DE iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 3.89% | 4.47% | 6.44% | 5.50% | 13.94% | 6.23% | 1.92% | 2.46% | 2.55% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 3.53% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 11.13% | 9.92% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQB.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.27%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -23.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQB.DE and QDVO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQB.DE | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.27% | -17.75% | -51.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | -10.21% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -6.43% | +5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -2.52% | -26.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 2.78% | +1.19% |
Volatility
IQQB.DE vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) at 4.52%. This indicates that IQQB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IQQB.DE | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 4.52% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.43% | 10.35% | +7.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.43% | 20.93% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 19.88% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 19.88% | +11.91% |