PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQB.DE vs. NIHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQQB.DE is traded in EUR, while NIHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NIHI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQB.DE achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than NIHI's 6.21% return.


IQQB.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
10.83%
6M
6.90%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
7.16%

NIHI

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.55%
YTD
6.21%
6M
7.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IQQB.DE
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
10.83%6.83%
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
6.21%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQB.DE and NIHI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQB.DE
IQQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NIHI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQB.DENIHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQB.DENIHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.34

-1.26

Drawdowns

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQB.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.27%, which is greater than NIHI's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQB.DE and NIHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQB.DENIHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.27%

-9.03%

-60.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.51%

-1.34%

-15.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-2.06%

-26.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

Volatility

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQB.DENIHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

13.47%

+8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.87%

13.47%

+12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

13.47%

+18.04%

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQB.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than NIHI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQB.DE vs. NIHI - Dividend Comparison

IQQB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than NIHI's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQB.DE
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.36%4.47%6.44%5.50%13.94%6.23%1.92%2.46%2.55%1.49%1.74%3.53%
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
7.96%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQB.DE and NIHI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NIHI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NIHI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQB.DE.

IQQB.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while NIHI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQB.DE and 0.68% for NIHI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQB.DE and NIHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer