PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQ6.DE achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly higher than R8T.DE's 5.83% return.


IQQ6.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
8.43%
6M
8.59%
1Y
9.26%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
3.38%

R8T.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
5.83%
6M
5.30%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IQQ6.DE
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF
8.43%-2.51%5.91%3.74%
R8T.DE
abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF
5.83%-3.97%2.59%5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ6.DE and R8T.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023

0.94

The correlation between IQQ6.DE and R8T.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ6.DE
IQQ6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IQQ6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

R8T.DE
R8T.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
R8T.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R8T.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
R8T.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
R8T.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
R8T.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQ6.DER8T.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.11

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

0.32

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

0.55

+3.08

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQ6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the R8T.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQ6.DE and R8T.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQ6.DER8T.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.24

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.16

+0.06

Drawdowns

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ6.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.50%, which is greater than R8T.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ6.DE and R8T.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQ6.DER8T.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.50%

-21.76%

-44.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-18.35%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-21.76%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-11.79%

+6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-7.54%

-6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

10.72%

-8.18%

Volatility

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) is 2.78%, while abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that IQQ6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than R8T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQ6.DER8T.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.99%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

9.05%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

24.56%

-13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.55%

-4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

18.55%

-2.19%

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ6.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than R8T.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQ6.DE vs. R8T.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQ6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while R8T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQ6.DE
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.51%3.61%3.37%3.39%3.91%2.51%3.58%3.24%4.53%3.49%3.45%3.27%
R8T.DE
abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IQQ6.DE and R8T.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, R8T.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

R8T.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQ6.DE.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQ6.DE and 0.40% for R8T.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ6.DE and R8T.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer