R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) and iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE).
R8T.DE and IQQ4.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. R8T.DE is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Feb 22, 2023. IQQ4.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Asia Dividend+. It was launched on Oct 20, 2006.
Performance
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.96% | -3.97% | 2.59% | 5.29% |
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | -1.73% | 15.95% | -4.23% | -4.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R8T.DE achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than IQQ4.DE's -1.73% return.
R8T.DE
- 1D
- -12.87%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQ4.DE
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 10.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
R8T.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQ4.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank
R8T.DE
IQQ4.DE
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) and iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| R8T.DE | IQQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | 0.88 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.34 | 1.25 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.23 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 5.01 | -4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| R8T.DE | IQQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 0.88 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.07 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between R8T.DE and IQQ4.DE is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison
R8T.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQ4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8T.DE abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQ4.DE iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF | 3.51% | 3.52% | 4.07% | 3.83% | 3.77% | 2.92% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 3.32% | 3.19% | 2.92% | 3.48% |
Drawdowns
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R8T.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.76%, smaller than the maximum IQQ4.DE drawdown of -66.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R8T.DE and IQQ4.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| R8T.DE | IQQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.76% | -66.50% | +44.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.35% | -9.98% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.34% | -13.19% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -20.28% | +12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.80% | 2.44% | +7.36% |
Volatility
R8T.DE vs. IQQ4.DE - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (R8T.DE) has a higher volatility of 22.18% compared to iShares Asia Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ4.DE) at 4.20%. This indicates that R8T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQ4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| R8T.DE | IQQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.18% | 4.20% | +17.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.44% | 8.15% | +23.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.00% | 11.98% | +22.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 11.84% | +10.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 14.77% | +7.70% |