IQMM vs. LSAT
IQMM (ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF) and LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IQMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LSAT.
Performance
IQMM vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQMM
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LSAT
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 17.77%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $113.50M | $180.03M | $146.31M | |
| $125.15K | $115.93K | $109.16K |
IQMM vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQMM ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF | 1.60% |
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 13.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQMM and LSAT is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQMM vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank
IQMM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LSAT
IQMM vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQMM | LSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQMM vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQMM drawdown since its inception was -0.02%, smaller than the maximum LSAT drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQMM and LSAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQMM | LSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -20.48% | +20.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.77% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.42% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.35% | — |
Volatility
IQMM vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQMM | LSAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 13.08% | -12.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 16.27% | -16.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.22% | 16.71% | -16.49% |
IQMM vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQMM vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison
IQMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than LSAT's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQMM ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF | 1.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.60% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.85% | 0.36% | 3.44% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQMM and LSAT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.
LSAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.50% for IQMM.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQMM and 0.99% for LSAT.
Find the right allocation for IQMM and LSAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer