PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQM vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IQM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IQM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
1.18%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-4.37%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%28.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -4.37% return.


IQM

1D
6.12%
1M
-5.61%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.33%
1Y
55.72%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*

SPY

1D
2.91%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IQM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IQM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQMSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

0.93

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

1.45

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

1.53

+2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.65

7.30

+4.35

IQM vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQM and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQMSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

0.93

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.69

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.56

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between IQM and SPY is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IQM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.14%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Drawdowns

IQM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and SPY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IQMSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.91%

-55.19%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-12.05%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.91%

-24.50%

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.68%

-6.24%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-9.09%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

2.52%

+2.18%

Volatility

IQM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.31%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IQMSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.90%

5.31%

+7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.48%

9.47%

+14.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.37%

19.05%

+14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.67%

17.06%

+11.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.73%

17.92%

+12.81%