IQM vs. SPY
IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. IQM is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQM returned 22.22%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
IQM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 40.18% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.
IQM
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 40.18%
- 6M
- 38.57%
- 1Y
- 75.07%
- 3Y*
- 37.62%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
IQM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 40.18% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 78.48% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 28.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQM and SPY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IQM and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQM
SPY
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IQM
SPY
Industrials
IQM
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
IQM
SPY
Utilities
IQM
SPY
Energy
IQM
SPY
Communication Services
IQM
SPY
Healthcare
IQM
SPY
Basic Materials
IQM
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
IQM
-
SPY
Financial Services
IQM
-
SPY
Real Estate
IQM
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
IQM
SPY
IQM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | 3.16 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.79 | 14.72 | +2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.38 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.82 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.59 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
IQM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.91% | -55.19% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -8.88% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.42% | -18.76% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.91% | -24.50% | -20.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.70% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -9.05% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 1.91% | +2.58% |
Volatility
IQM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.20% | 2.84% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.92% | 8.90% | +14.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.27% | 11.83% | +16.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 17.05% | +11.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.72% | 17.94% | +12.78% |
IQM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQM and SPY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQM dropped -44.91% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 13.83% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 13.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.
IQM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQM and 0.09% for SPY.
IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer