PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQM vs. PTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQM vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 32.93% return.


IQM

1D
1.95%
1M
-6.41%
6M
13.56%
YTD
19.53%
1Y
34.87%
3Y*
30.20%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.29%

PTF

1D
3.60%
1M
-10.35%
6M
16.15%
YTD
32.93%
1Y
48.98%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
22.59%
ALL TIME*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$905.23K$711.02K$931.48K
$25.58M$20.59M$16.31M

IQM vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
19.53%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%76.92%
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
32.93%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%77.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IQM and PTF is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.88

The correlation between IQM and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQM vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQM
PTF

Technology

70.5%
94.7%

Industrials

14.8%
1.8%

Utilities

3.5%

-

Energy

3.1%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%

-

Communication Services

1.1%
4.5%

Healthcare

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

IQM
70.5%
PTF
94.7%

Industrials

IQM
14.8%
PTF
1.8%

Utilities

IQM
3.5%
PTF

-

Energy

IQM
3.1%
PTF
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IQM
2.7%
PTF

-

Communication Services

IQM
1.1%
PTF
4.5%

Healthcare

IQM
1.0%
PTF

-

Basic Materials

IQM

-

PTF

-

Consumer Defensive

IQM

-

PTF

-

Financial Services

IQM

-

PTF
0.8%

Real Estate

IQM

-

PTF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQM vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IQM vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQMPTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.25

5.65

-0.40

IQM vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQM and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQM vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and PTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQMPTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.91%

-55.38%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.28%

-38.59%

+13.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.42%

-38.59%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.91%

-44.88%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.03%

-26.52%

+9.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-13.29%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

8.70%

-2.04%

Volatility

IQM vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) is 15.54%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 26.35%. This indicates that IQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQMPTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.54%

26.35%

-10.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.13%

43.30%

-12.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.17%

51.04%

-14.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.64%

38.01%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.69%

34.60%

-2.91%

IQM vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQM vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQM and PTF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (26.35%) compared to IQM (15.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQM dropped -44.91% vs PTF's -55.38%.

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 15.99% vs 14.94% for PTF. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IQM has been the lower-risk option at 15.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 15.99% return vs 14.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

PTF has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

IQM is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTF is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQM and 0.60% for PTF.

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQM and PTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer