PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IQM vs. DIVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IQM vs. DIVI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. IQM is actively managed, while DIVI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQM returned 15.99%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for DIVI. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IQM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.

Performance

IQM vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly higher than DIVI's 14.46% return.

IQM

1D
1.95%
1M
-6.41%
6M
13.56%
YTD
19.53%
1Y
34.87%
3Y*
30.20%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
25.29%

DIVI

1D
0.53%
1M
1.96%
6M
7.57%
YTD
14.46%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
11.22%
ALL TIME*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DIVI

Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
$5.65M$6.24M$8.16M

IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
$905.23K$711.02K$931.48K

IQM vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF		19.53%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%76.92%
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF		14.46%34.86%1.77%18.97%-1.21%16.95%3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IQM and DIVI is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.63

The correlation between IQM and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQM vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IQM
DIVI

Technology

70.5%
11.1%

Industrials

14.8%
16.5%

Utilities

3.5%
4.2%

Energy

3.1%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
6.8%

Communication Services

1.1%
4.0%

Healthcare

1.0%
8.8%

Basic Materials

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.6%

Financial Services

-

30.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Technology

IQM
70.5%
DIVI
11.1%

Industrials

IQM
14.8%
DIVI
16.5%

Utilities

IQM
3.5%
DIVI
4.2%

Energy

IQM
3.1%
DIVI
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IQM
2.7%
DIVI
6.8%

Communication Services

IQM
1.1%
DIVI
4.0%

Healthcare

IQM
1.0%
DIVI
8.8%

Basic Materials

IQM

-

DIVI
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

IQM

-

DIVI
6.6%

Financial Services

IQM

-

DIVI
30.1%

Real Estate

IQM

-

DIVI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF

Often compared with IQM:
IQM vs. AIQIQM vs. QQQIQM vs. IGMIQM vs. FMILIQM vs. BOTZIQM vs. ARKQIQM vs. ^GSPC
Often compared with DIVI:
DIVI vs. VYMIDIVI vs. LVHIDIVI vs. IDVODIVI vs. VIGIDIVI vs. VXUSDIVI vs. VOODIVI vs. FYLD

Return for Risk

IQM vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
DIVI
DIVI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IQM vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IQMDIVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.97
1.97

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.42
2.72

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.87

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.25

11.24

-6.00

IQM vs. DIVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the DIVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQM and DIVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQM vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and DIVI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IQMDIVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.91%

-27.76%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.28%

-10.54%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.42%

-14.58%

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.91%

-18.53%

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.03%

-0.14%

-16.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-3.59%

-8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

2.68%

+3.98%

Volatility

IQM vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 15.54% compared to Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) at 4.35%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IQMDIVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.54%

4.35%

+11.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.13%

13.29%

+17.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.17%

15.40%

+20.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.64%

15.48%

+15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.69%

16.33%

+15.36%

IQM vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQM vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison

IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF		3.54%3.76%4.39%3.17%6.03%2.77%8.04%1.61%5.67%5.22%11.56%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IQM and DIVI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQM has higher volatility (15.54%) compared to DIVI (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQM dropped -44.91% vs DIVI's -27.76%.

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 15.99% vs 13.57% for DIVI. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 15.99% return vs 13.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.

DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

IQM is categorized as Technology Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQM and 0.09% for DIVI.

DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQM and DIVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer