IQLT vs. INCO
IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQLT returned 9.47%/yr vs 8.31%/yr for INCO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for INCO.
Performance
IQLT vs. INCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than INCO's -12.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has outperformed INCO with an annualized return of 9.47%, while INCO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.31% annualized return.
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
INCO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -10.02%
- 1Y
- -12.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
IQLT vs. INCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 6.95% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -12.41% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 19.28% | 14.55% | -4.22% | -10.81% | 53.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQLT and INCO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.45 |
IQLT vs. INCO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQLT
INCO
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IQLT
INCO
-
Industrials
IQLT
INCO
Technology
IQLT
INCO
Healthcare
IQLT
INCO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IQLT
INCO
Basic Materials
IQLT
INCO
-
Consumer Defensive
IQLT
INCO
Energy
IQLT
INCO
-
Communication Services
IQLT
INCO
-
Utilities
IQLT
INCO
-
Real Estate
IQLT
INCO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQLT vs. INCO — Risk / Return Rank
IQLT
INCO
IQLT vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQLT | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.89 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | -0.58 | +2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | -1.46 | +6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQLT | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | -0.73 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.33 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.41 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.42 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
IQLT vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, smaller than the maximum INCO drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and INCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQLT | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -47.69% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -21.37% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -29.98% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.24% | -29.98% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | -47.69% | +15.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -25.40% | +22.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -10.58% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 8.47% | -5.74% |
Volatility
IQLT vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) is 4.50%, while Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IQLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQLT | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 5.50% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 14.33% | -1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 16.90% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 16.91% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 20.32% | -3.32% |
IQLT vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQLT vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison
IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.18% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQLT and INCO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCO has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IQLT (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs INCO's -47.69%.
On 10-year performance, IQLT leads with 9.47% vs 8.31% for INCO. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.
IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while INCO is Asia Pacific Equities. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.75% for INCO.
IQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQLT and INCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer