PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQLT vs. IDHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than IDHQ's 23.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has underperformed IDHQ with an annualized return of 9.54%, while IDHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.


IQLT

1D
-0.93%
1M
-0.13%
6M
5.83%
YTD
9.67%
1Y
17.05%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
9.54%

IDHQ

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.48%
6M
17.70%
YTD
23.96%
1Y
34.45%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
9.67%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-10.76%24.04%
IDHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF
23.96%27.46%1.33%18.80%-20.23%11.38%16.09%29.58%-13.38%28.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and IDHQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015

0.83

The correlation between IQLT and IDHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQLT vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IDHQ
IDHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IDHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IDHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQLTIDHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.58

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

10.14

-3.87

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the IDHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and IDHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and IDHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQLTIDHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-73.84%

+41.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-13.44%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-14.07%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.24%

-33.54%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

-33.54%

+1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-2.57%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-21.09%

+14.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.41%

-0.68%

Volatility

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) is 4.78%, while Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that IQLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQLTIDHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

7.92%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

18.93%

-6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

20.78%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

17.85%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

17.97%

-1.21%

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQLT vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than IDHQ's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF
2.04%2.46%2.41%2.52%3.33%2.10%1.60%2.10%2.67%1.68%2.36%1.71%
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.44%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IQLT and IDHQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IDHQ has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to IQLT (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.

On 10-year performance, IDHQ leads with 10.54% vs 9.54% for IQLT. On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 9.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 2.04% for IDHQ.

IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.29% for IDHQ.

IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQLT and IDHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer