PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDG vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDG vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDG achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IQDG has underperformed DHS with an annualized return of 7.63%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.


IQDG

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.47%
YTD
3.16%
6M
5.94%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
10.23%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
7.63%

DHS

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.38%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDG vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
3.16%24.19%-3.38%20.76%-19.97%12.28%16.58%30.03%-16.81%30.64%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
9.88%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDG and DHS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2016

0.56

The correlation between IQDG and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQDG vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDG
DHS

Industrials

24.7%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

19.3%
5.0%

Financial Services

15.5%
22.3%

Technology

9.9%
3.7%

Healthcare

9.7%
14.5%

Communication Services

5.8%
9.3%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
18.7%

Energy

4.2%
9.4%

Utilities

0.9%
9.0%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.8%

Industrials

IQDG
24.7%
DHS
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDG
19.3%
DHS
5.0%

Financial Services

IQDG
15.5%
DHS
22.3%

Technology

IQDG
9.9%
DHS
3.7%

Healthcare

IQDG
9.7%
DHS
14.5%

Communication Services

IQDG
5.8%
DHS
9.3%

Basic Materials

IQDG
5.3%
DHS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

IQDG
4.5%
DHS
18.7%

Energy

IQDG
4.2%
DHS
9.4%

Utilities

IQDG
0.9%
DHS
9.0%

Real Estate

IQDG
0.3%
DHS
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDG vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDG
IQDG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IQDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDG vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQDGDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.35

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.28

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

12.04

-8.67

IQDG vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDG and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQDGDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.06

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.77

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.41

+0.05

Drawdowns

IQDG vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDG drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDG and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDGDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-67.25%

+32.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-6.30%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.12%

-11.87%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-15.28%

-19.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

-37.35%

+2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-2.60%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-9.55%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

1.71%

+2.07%

Volatility

IQDG vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 2.88%. This indicates that IQDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDGDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

2.88%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

7.32%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

10.01%

+6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.80%

13.89%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.53%

16.08%

+1.45%

IQDG vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDG vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

IQDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than DHS's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.35%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.14%2.28%2.60%1.76%4.18%2.67%1.65%1.95%1.96%1.71%1.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDG and DHS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDG dropped -34.97% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, DHS leads with 9.47% vs 7.63% for IQDG. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DHS has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IQDG.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.14% for IQDG.

IQDG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. IQDG tracks WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IQDG and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDG and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer