PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDG vs. EZM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDG vs. EZM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDG achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than EZM's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IQDG has underperformed EZM with an annualized return of 8.03%, while EZM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.


IQDG

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.30%
6M
2.77%
YTD
6.88%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
8.03%
ALL TIME*
8.16%

EZM

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.12%
6M
10.42%
YTD
14.20%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
10.91%
ALL TIME*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.17M$1.36M$1.30M
$1.13M$1.22M$2.15M

IQDG vs. EZM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.88%24.19%-3.38%20.76%-19.97%12.28%16.58%30.03%-16.81%30.64%
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
14.20%8.42%10.29%19.69%-12.22%31.00%5.57%24.48%-12.36%17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDG and EZM is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016

0.64

The correlation between IQDG and EZM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQDG vs. EZM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDG
EZM

Consumer Cyclical

19.6%
14.1%

Industrials

19.4%
15.3%

Financial Services

15.1%
17.5%

Healthcare

9.4%
9.6%

Technology

8.3%
13.5%

Basic Materials

5.4%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
1.9%

Energy

3.7%
6.9%

Utilities

0.8%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.3%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDG
19.6%
EZM
14.1%

Industrials

IQDG
19.4%
EZM
15.3%

Financial Services

IQDG
15.1%
EZM
17.5%

Healthcare

IQDG
9.4%
EZM
9.6%

Technology

IQDG
8.3%
EZM
13.5%

Basic Materials

IQDG
5.4%
EZM
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

IQDG
4.3%
EZM
4.3%

Communication Services

IQDG
4.2%
EZM
1.9%

Energy

IQDG
3.7%
EZM
6.9%

Utilities

IQDG
0.8%
EZM
3.3%

Real Estate

IQDG
0.3%
EZM
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDG vs. EZM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IQDG
IQDG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IQDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

EZM
EZM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IQDG vs. EZM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQDGEZMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.62

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

9.10

-4.06

IQDG vs. EZM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the EZM Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDG and EZM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQDG vs. EZM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDG drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, smaller than the maximum EZM drawdown of -59.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDG and EZM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDGEZMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-59.58%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-8.70%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.12%

-23.53%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-23.53%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

-47.26%

+12.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.77%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-8.21%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

2.50%

+1.17%

Volatility

IQDG vs. EZM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) at 2.85%. This indicates that IQDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDGEZMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

2.85%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

10.08%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.75%

14.66%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

20.25%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

22.27%

-4.97%

IQDG vs. EZM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than EZM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDG vs. EZM - Dividend Comparison

IQDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than EZM's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
1.21%1.39%1.22%1.25%1.57%1.08%1.67%1.34%1.57%1.14%1.55%1.30%
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.36%2.28%2.60%1.76%4.18%2.67%1.65%1.95%1.96%1.71%1.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDG and EZM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDG has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to EZM (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDG dropped -34.97% vs EZM's -59.58%.

On 10-year performance, EZM leads with 10.91% vs 8.03% for IQDG. On fees, EZM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EZM has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZM has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IQDG.

IQDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.21% for EZM.

IQDG is categorized as Quality Factor, while EZM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IQDG tracks WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Index, while EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IQDG and 0.38% for EZM.

EZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDG and EZM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer