IQDG vs. CIL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL).

IQDG and CIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQDG is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2016. CIL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015. Both IQDG and CIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IQDG vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IQDG vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQDG WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund	-3.13%	24.19%	-3.38%	20.76%	-19.97%	12.28%	16.58%	30.03%	-16.81%	30.64%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDG achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return.

IQDG

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: -9.12%
• YTD: -3.13%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 15.12%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 4.03%
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 10.80%
• 1Y: 29.06%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDG vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

CIL

VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF

IQDG

WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund

Return for Risk

IQDG vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDG

IQDG Risk / Return Rank: 46
IQDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IQDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
IQDG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IQDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IQDG Martin Ratio Rank: 45

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 92
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDG vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	2.29	-1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	3.15	-1.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.54	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	2.32	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	15.10	-11.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQDG vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDG and CIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	2.29	-1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.53	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.44	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between IQDG and CIL is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IQDG vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

IQDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than CIL's 2.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQDG WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund	2.28%	2.28%	2.60%	1.76%	4.18%	2.67%	1.65%	1.95%	1.96%	1.71%	1.35%	0.00%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	2.38%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%

Drawdowns

IQDG vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDG drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDG and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.97%	-36.27%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.35%	-9.66%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.97%	-29.89%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.59%	-0.58%	-9.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-6.66%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	1.73%	+1.67%

Volatility

IQDG vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that IQDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.93%	0.00%	+7.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.56%	5.76%	+5.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.12%	13.30%	+4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.56%	16.67%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.42%	17.32%	+0.10%