IQDG vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IQDG (WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IQDG tracks the WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQDG returned 7.63%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for CIL. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQDG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

IQDG vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDG achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, IQDG has underperformed CIL with an annualized return of 7.63%, while CIL has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.

IQDG

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 3.16%
• 6M: 5.94%
• 1Y: 12.72%
• 3Y*: 10.23%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 7.63%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDG vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQDG WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund	3.16%	24.19%	-3.38%	20.76%	-19.97%	12.28%	16.58%	30.03%	-16.81%	30.64%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDG and CIL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2016	0.71

The correlation between IQDG and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQDG vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQDG	CIL
Industrials	24.7%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	19.3%	8.2%
Financial Services	15.5%	24.8%
Technology	9.9%	6.4%
Healthcare	9.7%	7.7%
Communication Services	5.8%	5.8%
Basic Materials	5.3%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	8.8%
Energy	4.2%	4.6%
Utilities	0.9%	6.6%
Real Estate	0.3%	2.2%

Return for Risk

IQDG vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDG

IQDG Risk / Return Rank: 23
IQDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
IQDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
IQDG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
IQDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
IQDG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 76
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDG vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	2.24	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	3.22	-1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.49	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	3.95	-2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.38	16.75	-13.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQDG vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDG and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	2.24	-1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.46	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.48	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.43	+0.02

Drawdowns

IQDG vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDG drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDG and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.97%	-36.27%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.35%	-4.60%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.12%	-11.96%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.97%	-29.89%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.97%	-36.27%	+1.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-0.58%	-3.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-6.56%	-0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	1.07%	+2.71%

Volatility

IQDG vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that IQDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQDG	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	0.00%	+5.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	4.23%	+9.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.18%	8.19%	+7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.80%	16.49%	+1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	17.17%	+0.36%

IQDG vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQDG vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

IQDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
IQDG WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund	2.14%	2.28%	2.60%	1.76%	4.18%	2.67%	1.65%	1.95%	1.96%	1.71%	1.35%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQDG and CIL in my portfolio?

IQDG and CIL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQDG or CIL?

IQDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDG dropped -34.97% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, IQDG or CIL?

On 10-year performance, CIL leads with 8.21% vs 7.63% for IQDG. On fees, IQDG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQDG or CIL?

Over the 10-year period, CIL has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQDG or CIL?

IQDG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQDG or CIL?

IQDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

What is the main difference between IQDG and CIL?

IQDG tracks WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IQDG and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.