PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPSHX vs. CRDBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPSHX achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 18.50% return.


IPSHX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.81%
YTD
14.91%
6M
14.54%
1Y
33.78%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
7.76%

CRDBX

1D
0.36%
1M
6.00%
YTD
18.50%
6M
18.57%
1Y
43.71%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IPSHX
Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund
14.91%10.90%6.79%18.85%-17.42%8.71%20.87%
CRDBX
Potomac Defensive Bull Fund
18.50%25.36%19.91%18.44%-8.21%28.08%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IPSHX and CRDBX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020

0.56

The correlation between IPSHX and CRDBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPSHX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPSHX
IPSHX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IPSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IPSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDBX
CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPSHXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

3.19

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

4.48

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.74

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

6.28

-1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.84

20.70

-5.86

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPSHX and CRDBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPSHXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

3.19

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.83

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.10

-0.58

Drawdowns

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPSHX drawdown since its inception was -25.73%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -28.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPSHX and CRDBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPSHXCRDBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.73%

-28.12%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-7.13%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.73%

-17.77%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.73%

-28.12%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-6.59%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.16%

+0.17%

Volatility

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPSHXCRDBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.15%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

10.82%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

14.19%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

19.73%

-4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

20.37%

-5.40%

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IPSHX and CRDBX have an expense ratio of 1.24%.


Dividends

IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

IPSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than CRDBX's 12.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CRDBX
Potomac Defensive Bull Fund
12.96%15.36%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IPSHX
Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund
2.89%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%16.18%0.00%0.90%3.68%6.15%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPSHX and CRDBX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDBX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to IPSHX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPSHX dropped -25.73% vs CRDBX's -28.12%.

CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPSHX and CRDBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer