IPSHX vs. CRDBX
IPSHX (Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund) and CRDBX (Potomac Defensive Bull Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, IPSHX returned 5.86%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for CRDBX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.24% expense ratio.
Performance
IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPSHX achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 18.50% return.
IPSHX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 33.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
CRDBX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 18.50%
- 6M
- 18.57%
- 1Y
- 43.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPSHX Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund | 14.91% | 10.90% | 6.79% | 18.85% | -17.42% | 8.71% | 20.87% |
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund | 18.50% | 25.36% | 19.91% | 18.44% | -8.21% | 28.08% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPSHX and CRDBX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IPSHX and CRDBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPSHX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank
IPSHX
CRDBX
IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPSHX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 3.19 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 4.48 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.74 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 6.28 | -1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.84 | 20.70 | -5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPSHX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 3.19 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.83 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.10 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPSHX drawdown since its inception was -25.73%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -28.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPSHX and CRDBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPSHX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -28.12% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -7.13% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.73% | -17.77% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | -28.12% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -6.59% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.16% | +0.17% |
Volatility
IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison
Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPSHX | CRDBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.15% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 10.82% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 14.19% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 19.73% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 20.37% | -5.40% |
IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IPSHX and CRDBX have an expense ratio of 1.24%.
Dividends
IPSHX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison
IPSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than CRDBX's 12.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDBX Potomac Defensive Bull Fund | 12.96% | 15.36% | 12.58% | 9.91% | 0.18% | 25.05% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPSHX Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund | 2.89% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.18% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 3.68% | 6.15% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPSHX and CRDBX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDBX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to IPSHX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPSHX dropped -25.73% vs CRDBX's -28.12%.
CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPSHX and CRDBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer