IPSHX vs. GIPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX).
IPSHX is managed by Pinnacle. It was launched on Sep 30, 2015. GIPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
IPSHX vs. GIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPSHX vs. GIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPSHX Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund | 2.43% | 10.90% | 6.79% | 18.85% | -17.42% | 8.71% | 22.20% | 15.05% | -13.11% | 11.19% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | -2.44% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 7.94% | 11.09% | 15.68% | -6.52% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPSHX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than GIPIX's -2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, IPSHX has outperformed GIPIX with an annualized return of 6.42%, while GIPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.45% annualized return.
IPSHX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
GIPIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPSHX vs. GIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPSHX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GIPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IPSHX vs. GIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
IPSHX
GIPIX
IPSHX vs. GIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPSHX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.14 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.60 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 0.93 | +1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 4.10 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPSHX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.14 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.68 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPSHX and GIPIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IPSHX vs. GIPIX - Dividend Comparison
IPSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than GIPIX's 5.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPSHX Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund | 3.24% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.18% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 3.68% | 6.15% | 0.71% | 0.00% |
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.95% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
Drawdowns
IPSHX vs. GIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPSHX drawdown since its inception was -25.73%, smaller than the maximum GIPIX drawdown of -29.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPSHX and GIPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPSHX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -29.46% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.25% | -6.33% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | -20.65% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.73% | -20.65% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.12% | -5.50% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -3.70% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.65% | +1.03% |
Volatility
IPSHX vs. GIPIX - Volatility Comparison
Pinnacle Sherman Multi-Strategy Core Fund (IPSHX) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) at 2.94%. This indicates that IPSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPSHX | GIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 2.94% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 4.78% | +6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 8.09% | +8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 7.93% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 8.06% | +6.86% |