IPDP vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

IPDP vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPDP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.15%

Return for Risk

IPDP vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IPDP	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.10%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPDP	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.38%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	3.38%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	3.38%	—

IPDP vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPDP vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IPDP or ACYS?

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPDP or ACYS?

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPDP or ACYS?

ACYS has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between IPDP and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.75% for ACYS.