IPAY vs. SMST
IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. IPAY is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, IPAY returned -10.90% vs 128.37% for SMST. Their -0.48 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IPAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.
Performance
IPAY vs. SMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -35.77% return.
IPAY
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- -10.90%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- -6.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.52%
SMST
- 1D
- 8.37%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- -29.35%
- YTD
- -35.77%
- 1Y
- 128.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -83.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.39M | $3.91M | $2.45M | |
| $15.35M | $15.12M | $17.58M |
IPAY vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -3.95% | -9.55% | 17.03% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -35.77% | -44.36% | -91.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and SMST is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAY vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank
IPAY
SMST
IPAY vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPAY | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.00 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 3.68 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and SMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAY | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -99.25% | +47.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -85.39% | +54.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.47% | -97.48% | +67.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -91.08% | +74.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.19% | 46.35% | -28.16% |
Volatility
IPAY vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.17%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 38.14%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAY | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 38.14% | -30.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 135.29% | -115.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.83% | 151.04% | -126.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.31% | 166.75% | -140.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 166.75% | -141.33% |
IPAY vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPAY vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.82% | 0.79% | 0.77% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAY and SMST have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMST has higher volatility (38.14%) compared to IPAY (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs SMST's -99.25%.
On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 128.37% vs -10.90% for IPAY. On fees, IPAY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 128.37% return vs -10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IPAY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.
IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.
IPAY is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 1.29% for SMST.
SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPAY and SMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer