IPAY vs. FTEC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IPAY tracks the Prime Mobile Payments Index while FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPAY returned 5.98%/yr vs 25.57%/yr for FTEC. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.

Performance

IPAY vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 31.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAY has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 5.98%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.57% annualized return.

IPAY

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -9.09%
• YTD: -16.45%
• 6M: -16.03%
• 1Y: -23.21%
• 3Y*: 1.92%
• 5Y*: -8.70%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

FTEC

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 18.21%
• YTD: 31.89%
• 6M: 30.74%
• 1Y: 60.87%
• 3Y*: 33.93%
• 5Y*: 22.49%
• 10Y*: 25.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAY vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-16.45%	-9.55%	25.88%	18.21%	-32.38%	-12.72%	34.22%	41.80%	0.17%	36.34%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	31.89%	22.11%	29.40%	53.30%	-29.59%	30.49%	45.83%	48.93%	-0.39%	36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and FTEC is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2015	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between IPAY and FTEC has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IPAY vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPAY	FTEC
Technology	54.6%	98.0%
Financial Services	41.3%	0.6%
Industrials	4.1%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IPAY vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 2
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FTEC

FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 77
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAY vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPAY	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	2.97	-3.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	3.65	-4.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.48	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	3.76	-4.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	12.10	-13.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPAY vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPAY	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98	2.97	-3.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	0.90	-1.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	1.04	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.99	-0.78

Drawdowns

IPAY vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and FTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAY	FTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.75%	-34.95%	-16.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.31%	-16.26%	-15.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.74%	-27.30%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.49%	-34.95%	-16.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.75%	-34.95%	-16.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.51%	-1.49%	-38.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-5.56%	-11.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.32%	5.05%	+11.27%

Volatility

IPAY vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) have volatilities of 6.51% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAY	FTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	6.43%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.19%	16.14%	+2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.70%	20.63%	+3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.04%	25.23%	+0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.38%	24.69%	+0.69%

IPAY vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPAY vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	0.32%	0.43%	0.49%	0.77%	0.93%	0.63%	0.83%	1.03%	1.20%	0.96%	1.25%	1.27%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.94%	0.79%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAY and FTEC in my portfolio?

IPAY and FTEC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAY or FTEC?

IPAY has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

Which ETF is better, IPAY or FTEC?

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.57% vs 5.98% for IPAY. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAY or FTEC?

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAY or FTEC?

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAY or FTEC?

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

What is the main difference between IPAY and FTEC?

IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 0.08% for FTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.