IPAY vs. FTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
IPAY and FTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IPAY is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Mobile Payments Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2015. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both IPAY and FTEC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IPAY or FTEC.
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and FTEC is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IPAY vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IPAY:
1.38
FTEC:
1.16
IPAY:
2.00
FTEC:
1.61
IPAY:
1.24
FTEC:
1.21
IPAY:
0.72
FTEC:
1.71
IPAY:
4.81
FTEC:
5.92
IPAY:
5.73%
FTEC:
4.40%
IPAY:
20.00%
FTEC:
22.44%
IPAY:
-51.75%
FTEC:
-34.95%
IPAY:
-15.85%
FTEC:
-0.60%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 3.53% return.
IPAY
5.04%
2.84%
22.56%
28.57%
2.63%
N/A
FTEC
3.53%
2.49%
10.89%
28.76%
20.65%
20.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPAY vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IPAY vs. FTEC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IPAY
FTEC
IPAY vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IPAY vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than FTEC's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.74% | 0.77% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.66% | 0.03% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.47% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and FTEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IPAY vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 4.61%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.