IPAY vs. FDFF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index, while FDFF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. IPAY is passively managed, while FDFF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IPAY returned 6.01%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for FDFF. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IPAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDFF.

Performance

IPAY vs. FDFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than FDFF's 2.08% return.

IPAY

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 4.88%
• 6M: 3.61%
• YTD: -2.46%
• 1Y: -9.51%
• 3Y*: 6.01%
• 5Y*: -5.73%
• 10Y*: 7.66%
• ALL TIME*: 6.67%

FDFF

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 5.14%
• 6M: 3.96%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 1Y: -1.80%
• 3Y*: 11.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	$136.84K	$154.95K	$132.20K
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	$3.69M	$3.96M	$2.49M

IPAY vs. FDFF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-2.46%	-9.55%	25.88%	10.53%
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	2.08%	-2.75%	27.86%	16.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and FDFF is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023	0.89

The correlation between IPAY and FDFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPAY vs. FDFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPAY	FDFF
Technology	52.0%	18.5%
Financial Services	43.1%	75.7%
Industrials	4.9%	4.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IPAY vs. FDFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 7
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FDFF

FDFF Risk / Return Rank: 9
FDFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FDFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FDFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FDFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FDFF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPAY vs. FDFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPAY	FDFF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	-0.10	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	-0.01	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.00	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	-0.09	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.52	-0.18	-0.35

IPAY vs. FDFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the FDFF Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and FDFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPAY vs. FDFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than FDFF's maximum drawdown of -23.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and FDFF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAY	FDFF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.75%	-23.06%	-28.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.88%	-20.60%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.74%	-23.06%	-9.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.38%	-7.30%	-22.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-6.66%	-10.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.21%	10.26%	+7.95%

Volatility

IPAY vs. FDFF - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) at 4.86%. This indicates that IPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAY	FDFF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.11%	4.86%	+2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	14.88%	+5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.73%	18.62%	+6.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.33%	18.95%	+7.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	18.95%	+6.48%

IPAY vs. FDFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFF's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPAY vs. FDFF - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than FDFF's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	0.97%	0.86%	0.70%	0.27%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.81%	0.79%	0.77%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAY and FDFF in my portfolio?

IPAY and FDFF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAY or FDFF?

IPAY has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to FDFF (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs FDFF's -23.06%.

Which ETF is better, IPAY or FDFF?

On 3-year performance, FDFF leads with 11.88% vs 6.01% for IPAY. On fees, FDFF is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FDFF has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAY or FDFF?

Over the 3-year period, FDFF has performed better with a 11.88% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAY or FDFF?

FDFF is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAY or FDFF?

FDFF has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.81% for IPAY.

What is the main difference between IPAY and FDFF?

IPAY is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDFF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 0.50% for FDFF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.