FDFF vs. FBCG

In the year-to-date period, FDFF achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's -3.91% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FDFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFF and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than FBCG's 0.13% yield.

The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.07%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and FBCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) is 4.92%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that FDFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.