IPAC vs. EWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM).
IPAC and EWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IPAC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. EWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Malaysia Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both IPAC and EWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IPAC vs. EWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPAC vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 4.51% | 25.16% | 6.18% | 14.51% | -13.68% | 3.09% | 12.39% | 19.44% | -12.78% | 25.97% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.84% | 15.74% | 19.46% | -3.61% | -6.00% | -7.40% | 3.12% | -1.41% | -6.28% | 24.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAC achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than EWM's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAC has outperformed EWM with an annualized return of 8.70%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.
IPAC
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
EWM
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPAC vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IPAC vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank
IPAC
EWM
IPAC vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAC | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.76 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.41 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.10 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 11.53 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAC | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.76 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.37 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.11 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.07 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAC and EWM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IPAC vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison
IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than EWM's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 4.14% | 4.32% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.29% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% |
Drawdowns
IPAC vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and EWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAC | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -89.19% | +58.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -9.09% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -23.84% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.99% | -43.81% | +12.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.62% | -8.24% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -31.98% | +24.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.44% | +0.58% |
Volatility
IPAC vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 5.96%. This indicates that IPAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPAC | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.46% | 5.96% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 10.29% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 15.87% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 13.62% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 16.36% | +0.22% |