IPAC vs. DXJ
IPAC (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAC is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPAC returned 8.77%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for DXJ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPAC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
IPAC vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAC achieves a 13.28% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 22.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAC has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 8.77%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.62% annualized return.
IPAC
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
DXJ
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- YTD
- 22.23%
- 1Y
- 54.82%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 27.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.62%
IPAC vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 13.28% | 25.16% | 6.18% | 14.51% | -13.68% | 3.09% | 12.39% | 19.44% | -12.78% | 25.97% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 22.23% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAC and DXJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IPAC and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IPAC vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPAC
DXJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
IPAC
DXJ
Industrials
IPAC
DXJ
Technology
IPAC
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
IPAC
DXJ
Basic Materials
IPAC
DXJ
Healthcare
IPAC
DXJ
Real Estate
IPAC
DXJ
-
Communication Services
IPAC
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
IPAC
DXJ
Utilities
IPAC
DXJ
Energy
IPAC
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAC vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
IPAC
DXJ
IPAC vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPAC | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.54 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 5.02 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 19.10 | -10.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPAC vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAC | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -49.63% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -10.98% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -22.19% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -22.19% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.99% | -39.14% | +8.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -2.62% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -14.27% | +6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.88% | +0.36% |
Volatility
IPAC vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) is 5.94%, while WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that IPAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAC | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 6.56% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 14.47% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 18.30% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 19.06% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 19.93% | -3.33% |
IPAC vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPAC vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than DXJ's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.96% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 3.90% | 4.32% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAC and DXJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXJ has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to IPAC (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAC dropped -30.99% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.62% vs 8.77% for IPAC. On fees, IPAC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IPAC has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.62% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IPAC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
IPAC has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.96% for DXJ.
IPAC is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. IPAC tracks MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IPAC and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPAC and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer